linux-kernel - Re: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Oct 2012 21:10:05 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:	dl8bcu@...bcu.de, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
	Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [regression] boot failure on alpha, bisected

On 10/08, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> Just wondering. As this is on an SMP system, perhaps the
> read_barrier_depends() vs. smp_read_barrier_depends() matters
> here?
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1209.3/00555.html

Yes, thanks, I do remember about this ;)

This will come as 2/2 which also removes the unnecessary "work = NULL"
initialization.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/