linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] make CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL invisible and default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 8 Oct 2012 17:46:08 -0700
From:	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL invisible and default

On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 03:08:40PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 9:17 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 06:25:38AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 12:50:42PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
>> >> > This config item has not carried much meaning for a while now and is
>> >> > almost always enabled by default. As agreed during the Linux kernel
>> >> > summit, it should be removed. As a first step, remove it from being
>> >> > listed, and default it to on. Once it has been removed from all
>> >> > subsystem Kconfigs, it will be dropped entirely.
>> >> >
>> >> > CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> >> > CC: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>> >> > CC: Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>
>> >> > CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> >> > CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
>> >> > CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >
>> >> > This is the first of a series of 202 patches removing EXPERIMENTAL from
>> >> > all the Kconfigs in the tree. Should I send them all to lkml (with all
>> >> > the associated CCs), or do people want to cherry-pick changes from my
>> >> > tree? I don't want to needlessly flood the list.
>> >> >
>> >> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/experimental
>> >> >
>> >> > I figure this patch can stand alone to at least make EXPERIMENTAL go
>> >> > away from the menus, and give us a taste of what the removal would do
>> >> > to builds.
>> >>
>> >> OK, I will bite...  How should I flag an option that is initially only
>> >> intended for those willing to take some level of risk?
>> >
>> > In the text say "You really don't want to enable this option, use at
>> > your own risk!"  Or something like that :)
>>
>> So, should I update the commit description to include a suggested
>> alternative? (If so, which one?)
>
> Which do you prefer?

I think developers that want something harder that strongly worded
text in the Kconfig title or description should throw a printk.

>> Who is going to carry this initial patch, btw?
>
> You?  :)

Do you mean to say I should ask Stephen to pull from one of my trees
for linux-next? If so, I've made this now:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git linux-next

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Chrome OS Security
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/