linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] regulator: tps65090: add external control support for DCDC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Oct 2012 16:41:23 +0530
From:	Venu Byravarasu <vbyravarasu@...dia.com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
CC:	"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com" 
	<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>, "lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] regulator: tps65090: add external control support
 for DCDC

On Tuesday 09 October 2012 03:32 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2012 04:03 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
>>> +static struct regulator_ops tps65090_ext_control_ops = {
>>> +};
>> What is the purpose of adding empty structure?
>>
> We will not able to register regulator if there is no ops.
> In regulator register:
>           if (regulator_desc->name == NULL || regulator_desc->ops == NULL)
>                   return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
If tps65090_ops would be left as is, without renaming it, hope this empty
structure can be removed.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/