linux-kernel - Re: [remoteproc:for-next 6/9] remoteproc_virtio.c:(.text+0x238e7e): undefined reference to `vring_transport

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Oct 2012 17:26:45 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
Cc:	Sjur BRENDELAND <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	"Linus Walleij (linus.walleij@...aro.org)" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	"kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org" <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [remoteproc:for-next 6/9] remoteproc_virtio.c:(.text+0x238e7e):
 undefined reference to `vring_transport_features'

On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 04:15:15PM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com> wrote:
> > Unless there is a good reason why
> 
> That's what I'm asking. Is there an inherent coupling with some
> platform/architecture ? E.g., OMAP remote processors only go with
> OMAP chips.

If it already compiles fine on x86 then there is no advantage to
disabling it.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/