| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2012 00:21:09 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
"Andrew M. Theurer" <habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Srikar <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Jiannan Ouyang <ouyang@...pitt.edu>,
chegu vinod <chegu_vinod@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/2] kvm: Handle undercommitted guest case in PLE
handler
* Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> [2012-10-04 17:00:28]:
> On 10/04/2012 03:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 14:41 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >>
> >> Again the numbers are ridiculously high for arch_local_irq_restore.
> >> Maybe there's a bad perf/kvm interaction when we're injecting an
> >> interrupt, I can't believe we're spending 84% of the time running the
> >> popf instruction.
> >
> > Smells like a software fallback that doesn't do NMI, hrtimer based
> > sampling typically hits popf where we re-enable interrupts.
>
> Good nose, that's probably it. Raghavendra, can you ensure that the PMU
> is properly exposed? 'dmesg' in the guest will tell. If it isn't, -cpu
> host will expose it (and a good idea anyway to get best performance).
>
Hi Avi, you are right. SandyBridge machine result was not proper.
I cleaned up the services, enabled PMU, re-ran all the test again.
Here is the summary:
We do get good benefit by increasing ple window. Though we don't
see good benefit for kernbench and sysbench, for ebizzy, we get huge
improvement for 1x scenario. (almost 2/3rd of ple disabled case).
Let me know if you think we can increase the default ple_window
itself to 16k.
I am experimenting with V2 version of undercommit improvement(this) patch
series, But I think if you wish to go for increase of
default ple_window, then we would have to measure the benefit of patches
when ple_window = 16k.
I can respin the whole series including this default ple_window change.
I also have the perf kvm top result for both ebizzy and kernbench.
I think they are in expected lines now.
Improvements
================
16 core PLE machine with 16 vcpu guest
base = 3.6.0-rc5 + ple handler optimization patches
base_pleopt_16k = base + ple_window = 16k
base_pleopt_32k = base + ple_window = 32k
base_pleopt_nople = base + ple_gap = 0
kernbench, hackbench, sysbench (time in sec lower is better)
ebizzy (rec/sec higher is better)
% improvements w.r.t base (ple_window = 4k)
---------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
|base_pleopt_16k| base_pleopt_32k | base_pleopt_nople |
---------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
kernbench_1x | 0.42371 | 1.15164 | 0.09320 |
kernbench_2x | -1.40981 | -17.48282 | -570.77053 |
---------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
sysbench_1x | -0.92367 | 0.24241 | -0.27027 |
sysbench_2x | -2.22706 |-0.30896 | -1.27573 |
sysbench_3x | -0.75509 | 0.09444 | -2.97756 |
---------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
ebizzy_1x | 54.99976 | 67.29460 | 74.14076 |
ebizzy_2x | -8.83386 |-27.38403 | -96.22066 |
---------------+---------------+-----------------+-------------------+
perf kvm top observation for kernbench and ebizzy (nople, 4k, 32k window)
========================================================================
pleopt ple_gap=0
--------------------
ebizzy : 18131 records/s
63.78% [guest.kernel] [g] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
5.65% [guest.kernel] [g] smp_call_function_many
3.12% [guest.kernel] [g] clear_page
3.02% [guest.kernel] [g] down_read_trylock
1.85% [guest.kernel] [g] async_page_fault
1.81% [guest.kernel] [g] up_read
1.76% [guest.kernel] [g] native_apic_mem_write
1.70% [guest.kernel] [g] find_vma
kernbench :Elapsed Time 29.4933 (27.6007)
5.72% [guest.kernel] [g] async_page_fault
3.48% [guest.kernel] [g] pvclock_clocksource_read
2.68% [guest.kernel] [g] copy_user_generic_unrolled
2.58% [guest.kernel] [g] clear_page
2.09% [guest.kernel] [g] page_cache_get_speculative
2.00% [guest.kernel] [g] do_raw_spin_lock
1.78% [guest.kernel] [g] unmap_single_vma
1.74% [guest.kernel] [g] kmem_cache_alloc
pleopt ple_window = 4k
---------------------------
ebizzy: 10176 records/s
69.17% [guest.kernel] [g] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
3.34% [guest.kernel] [g] clear_page
2.16% [guest.kernel] [g] down_read_trylock
1.94% [guest.kernel] [g] async_page_fault
1.89% [guest.kernel] [g] native_apic_mem_write
1.63% [guest.kernel] [g] smp_call_function_many
1.58% [guest.kernel] [g] SetPageLRU
1.37% [guest.kernel] [g] up_read
1.01% [guest.kernel] [g] find_vma
kernbench: 29.9533
nts: 240K cycles
6.04% [guest.kernel] [g] async_page_fault
4.17% [guest.kernel] [g] pvclock_clocksource_read
3.28% [guest.kernel] [g] clear_page
2.57% [guest.kernel] [g] copy_user_generic_unrolled
2.30% [guest.kernel] [g] do_raw_spin_lock
2.13% [guest.kernel] [g] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
1.93% [guest.kernel] [g] page_cache_get_speculative
1.92% [guest.kernel] [g] unmap_single_vma
1.77% [guest.kernel] [g] kmem_cache_alloc
1.61% [guest.kernel] [g] __d_lookup_rcu
1.19% [guest.kernel] [g] find_vma
1.19% [guest.kernel] [g] __list_del_entry
pleopt: ple_window=16k
-------------------------
ebizzy: 16990
62.35% [guest.kernel] [g] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
5.22% [guest.kernel] [g] smp_call_function_many
3.57% [guest.kernel] [g] down_read_trylock
3.20% [guest.kernel] [g] clear_page
2.16% [guest.kernel] [g] up_read
1.89% [guest.kernel] [g] find_vma
1.86% [guest.kernel] [g] async_page_fault
1.81% [guest.kernel] [g] native_apic_mem_write
kernbench: 28.5
6.24% [guest.kernel] [g] async_page_fault
4.16% [guest.kernel] [g] pvclock_clocksource_read
3.33% [guest.kernel] [g] clear_page
2.50% [guest.kernel] [g] copy_user_generic_unrolled
2.08% [guest.kernel] [g] do_raw_spin_lock
1.98% [guest.kernel] [g] unmap_single_vma
1.89% [guest.kernel] [g] kmem_cache_alloc
1.82% [guest.kernel] [g] page_cache_get_speculative
1.46% [guest.kernel] [g] __d_lookup_rcu
1.42% [guest.kernel] [g] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
1.15% [guest.kernel] [g] __list_del_entry
1.10% [guest.kernel] [g] find_vma
Detailed result for the run
=============================
patched = base_pleopt_16k
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
kernbench
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
base stddev patched stdev %improve
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x 30.0440 1.1896 29.9167 1.6755 0.42371
2x 62.0083 3.4884 62.8825 2.5509 -1.40981
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
sysbench
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x 7.1779 0.0577 7.2442 0.0479 -0.92367
2x 15.5362 0.3370 15.8822 0.3591 -2.22706
3x 23.8249 0.1513 24.0048 0.1844 -0.75509
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
ebizzy
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x 10358.0000 442.6598 16054.8750 252.5088 54.99976
2x 2705.5000 130.0286 2466.5000 120.0024 -8.83386
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
patched = base_pleopt_32k
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
kernbench
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
base stddev patched stdev %improve
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x 30.0440 1.1896 29.6980 0.6760 1.15164
2x 62.0083 3.4884 72.8491 4.4616 -17.48282
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
sysbench
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x 7.1779 0.0577 7.1605 0.0447 0.24241
2x 15.5362 0.3370 15.5842 0.1731 -0.30896
3x 23.8249 0.1513 23.8024 0.2342 0.09444
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
ebizzy
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x 10358.0000 442.6598 17328.3750 281.4569 67.29460
2x 2705.5000 130.0286 1964.6250 143.0793 -27.38403
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
patched = base_pleopt_nople
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
kernbench
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
base stddev patched stdev %improve
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x 30.0440 1.1896 30.0160 0.7523 0.09320
2x 62.0083 3.4884 415.9334 189.9901 -570.77053
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
sysbench
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x 7.1779 0.0577 7.1973 0.0354 -0.27027
2x 15.5362 0.3370 15.7344 0.2315 -1.27573
3x 23.8249 0.1513 24.5343 0.3437 -2.97756
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
ebizzy
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
1x 10358.0000 442.6598 18037.5000 315.2074 74.14076
2x 2705.5000 130.0286 102.2500 104.3521 -96.22066
+-----------+-----------+-----------+------------+-----------+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists