linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] aio: vmap ringbuffer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 9 Oct 2012 14:31:11 -0700
From:	Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
To:	Zach Brown <zab@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dm-devel@...hat.com, tytso@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] aio: vmap ringbuffer

On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:29:49AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:39:19PM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > It simplifies a lot of stuff if the ringbuffer is contiguously mapped
> > into kernel space, and we can delete a lot of code - in particular, this
> > is useful for converting read_events() to cmpxchg.
> 
> 1) I'm concerned that Our Favourite Database Benchmarkers will see an
> effect of having more TLB pressure from that mapping.  kmap_atomic()
> should be cheaper.  We'll need to measure the difference.

If it is measurable I'll take another stab at using memory from
__get_free_pages() for the ringbuffer. That really would be the ideal
solution.

The other reason I wanted to do this was for the aio attributes stuff -
for return values, I think the only sane way is for the return values to
go in the ringbuffer, which means records are no longer fixed size so
dealing with pages is even more of a pain.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/