lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 15 Oct 2012 21:44:23 +0200
From:	Dmitry Fleytman <dmitry@...nix.com>
To:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Chris Webb <chris.webb@...stichosts.com>,
	Richard Davies <richard.davies@...stichosts.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000 driver RX race condition fixed

Hello, Alex

Originally this bug was reported for virtual machines running on top
of QEMU/KVM.
After patch preparation I've tested it on physical e1000 card and it
worked fine.

However, it could be I've missed something, as I see now other Intel
drivers (e1000e, ixgb, etc.)
use the same sequence (RX enable and then ring allocate), so I'm
starting to suspect that this is
the correct behavior.

If you confirm this is the way HW works, the this patch should be
ignored. This is pure QEMU bug and we'll fix it there.

Thanks,
Dmitry.

On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Alexander Duyck
<alexander.h.duyck@...el.com> wrote:
> On 10/14/2012 10:19 AM, Dmitry Fleytman wrote:
>> There is a race condition in e1000 driver.
>> It enables HW receive before RX rings initalization.
>> In case of specific timing this may lead to host memory corruption
>> due to DMA write to arbitrary memory location.
>> Following patch fixes this issue by reordering initialization steps.
>>
>> Other Intel network drivers does not seem to have this issue.
>>
>> Dmitry Fleytman (1):
>>   RX initialization sequence fixed - enable RX after corresponding ring
>>     initialization only
>>
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_ethtool.c |    9 +++++----
>>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000/e1000_main.c    |   18 ++++++++++++++++--
>>  2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>
> What device was it you saw this issue with?  The reason why I ask is
> because I suspect this change should cause most of our e1000 hardware to
> lock up since normally if you allocate buffers and then enable Rx it
> will mean the ring was not updated and it will treat it as if there are
> no buffers available.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alex
>



-- 
Dmitry Fleytman
Technology Expert and Consultant,

Daynix Computing Ltd.

Cell: +972-54-2819481

Skype: dmitry.fleytman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ