linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/3] perf_event: Enable overflow on KNC with a custom knc_pmu_handle

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2012 13:05:45 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	eranian@...il.com,
	"Meadows, Lawrence F" <lawrence.f.meadows@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/3] perf_event: Enable overflow on KNC with a custom
 knc_pmu_handle_irq()


Although based on the P6 design, the interrupt mechnanism
for KNC more closely resembles the intel architectural perfmon one.

We can't just re-use that code though, because KNC has different
MSR numbers for the status and ack registers.

In this case we just cut-and paste from perf_event_intel.c
with some minor changes, as it looks like it would not be
worth the trouble to change that code to be MSR-configurable.

Signed-off-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>

diff -ur linux-3.7-rc1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c linux-3.7-rc1/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c
--- linux-3.7-rc1.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c	2012-10-14 17:41:04.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-3.7-rc1/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_knc.c	2012-10-17 12:11:48.604393067 -0400
@@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
 #include <linux/perf_event.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
+#include <asm/hardirq.h>
+
 #include "perf_event.h"
 
 static const u64 knc_perfmon_event_map[] =
@@ -197,6 +199,80 @@
 	(void)wrmsrl_safe(hwc->config_base + hwc->idx, val);
 }
 
+static inline u64 knc_pmu_get_status(void)
+{
+	u64 status;
+
+	rdmsrl(MSR_KNC_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_STATUS, status);
+
+	return status;
+}
+
+static inline void knc_pmu_ack_status(u64 ack)
+{
+	wrmsrl(MSR_KNC_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_OVF_CONTROL, ack);
+}
+
+static int knc_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	struct perf_sample_data data;
+	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc;
+	int bit, loops;
+	u64 status;
+	int handled=0;
+
+	cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_events);
+
+	knc_pmu_disable_all();
+
+	status = knc_pmu_get_status();
+	if (!status) {
+		knc_pmu_enable_all(0);
+		return handled;
+	}
+
+	loops = 0;
+again:
+	knc_pmu_ack_status(status);
+	if (++loops > 100) {
+		WARN_ONCE(1, "perfevents: irq loop stuck!\n");
+		perf_event_print_debug();
+		goto done;
+	}
+
+	inc_irq_stat(apic_perf_irqs);
+
+	for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&status, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
+		struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[bit];
+
+		handled++;
+
+		if (!test_bit(bit, cpuc->active_mask))
+			continue;
+
+		if (!intel_pmu_save_and_restart(event))
+			continue;
+
+		perf_sample_data_init(&data, 0, event->hw.last_period);
+
+		if (perf_event_overflow(event, &data, regs))
+			x86_pmu_stop(event, 0);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Repeat if there is more work to be done:
+	 */
+	status = knc_pmu_get_status();
+	if (status)
+		goto again;
+
+done:
+	knc_pmu_enable_all(0);
+
+	return handled;
+}
+
+
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(event,	"config:0-7"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(umask,	"config:8-15"	);
 PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(edge,	"config:18"	);
@@ -214,7 +290,7 @@
 
 static __initconst struct x86_pmu knc_pmu = {
 	.name			= "knc",
-	.handle_irq		= x86_pmu_handle_irq,
+	.handle_irq		= knc_pmu_handle_irq,
 	.disable_all		= knc_pmu_disable_all,
 	.enable_all		= knc_pmu_enable_all,
 	.enable			= knc_pmu_enable_event,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/