linux-kernel - Re: weird use-after-free bug in module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 18:09:51 +0100
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc:	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: weird use-after-free bug in module_put

On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 09:33:18AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:

> We are now removing instance of character device corresponding to input
> device when input device disappears.
> 
> Ah, I know... cdev is embedded in evdev, but lives longer.. I do want to
> keep cdev embedded as it allows me to easily get to evdev in
> evdev_open(), but I need to be able to add and then drop reference to
> evdev from cdev's ->release() method. This means I need to override it.
> 
> Or I could have cdev separately allocated, but then I'd like to have a
> void pointer in "struct cdev" so I could get from it back to
> corresponding evdev.

Your real problem is that you have two kobjects embedded into the same
thing.  It can work, but you need to make the secondary (one that does
*not* free in its ->release()) pin the primary.  Sigh...  Device model
sucks, film at 11...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/