linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (tip/s390 trees related)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Oct 2012 23:52:42 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree
 (tip/s390 trees related)

On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 17:02 +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:
>   CC      mm/huge_memory.o
> mm/huge_memory.c: In function ‘do_huge_pmd_prot_none’:
> mm/huge_memory.c:789:3: error: incompatible type for argument 3 of ‘update_mmu_cache’

That appears to have become update_mmu_cache_pmd(), which makes sense
given that there's now architectures that care about it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/