linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 16/34] perf, x86: Support weight samples for PEBS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:15:10 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com,
	eranian@...gle.com, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/34] perf, x86: Support weight samples for PEBS

On Thu, 2012-10-18 at 16:19 -0700, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> When a weighted sample is requested, first try to report the TSX abort cost
> on Haswell. If that is not available report the memory latency. This
> allows profiling both by abort cost and by memory latencies.
> 
> Memory latencies requires enabling a different PEBS mode (LL).
> When both address and weight is requested address wins.
> 
> The LL mode only works for memory related PEBS events, so add a
> separate event constraint table for those.
> 
> I only did this for Haswell for now, but it could be added
> for several other Intel CPUs too by just adding the right
> table for them.

This looks like it will interfere with Stephane's LL patches -- which
should be out any day now ;-)

Stephane, any comments on how we should deal with all that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/