linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/slob: Mark zone page state to get slab usage at /proc/meminfo

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:43:09 -0300
From:	Ezequiel Garcia <elezegarcia@...il.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/slob: Mark zone page state to get slab usage at /proc/meminfo

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2012, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
>
>> SLUB handles large kmalloc allocations falling back
>> to page-size allocations (kmalloc_large, etc).
>> This path doesn't touch NR_SLAB_XXRECLAIMABLE zone item state.
>
> Right. UNRECLAIMABLE allocations do not factor in reclaim decisions.
>

I wasn't asking about reclaim decisions.

I think my question wasn't clear.

The issue is: with SLUB large kmallocs don't set NR_SLAB_UNRECLAIMABLE
zone item.
Thus, they don't show at /proc/meminfo. Is this okey?

Thanks!

    Ezequiel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/