lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 24 Oct 2012 17:25:14 +0800
From:	Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@...ote.com>,
	Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Fix a deadlock of cpu-hotplug

We found poweroff sometimes fails on our computers, so we have the
lock debug options configured. Then, when we do poweroff or take a
cpu down via cpu-hotplug, kernel complain as below. To resove this,
we modify sched_ttwu_pending(), disable the local irq when acquire
rq->lock.

[   83.066406] =================================
[   83.066406] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
[   83.066406] 3.5.0-3.lemote #428 Not tainted
[   83.066406] ---------------------------------
[   83.066406] inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage.
[   83.066406] migration/1/7 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
[   83.066406]  (&rq->lock){?.-.-.}, at: [<ffffffff802585ac>] sched_ttwu_pending+0x64/0x98
[   83.066406] {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at:
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff8027c9ac>] __lock_acquire+0x80c/0x1cc0
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff8027e3d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x9c
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff8074ba04>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x50
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff8025a2fc>] scheduler_tick+0x48/0x178
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff8023b334>] update_process_times+0x54/0x70
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff80277568>] tick_handle_periodic+0x2c/0x9c
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff8020a818>] c0_compare_interrupt+0x8c/0x94
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff8029ec8c>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x7c/0x248
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff802a2774>] handle_percpu_irq+0x8c/0xc0
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff8029e2c8>] generic_handle_irq+0x48/0x58
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff80205c04>] do_IRQ+0x18/0x24
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff802016e4>] mach_irq_dispatch+0xe4/0x124
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff80203ca0>] ret_from_irq+0x0/0x4
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff8022d114>] console_unlock+0x3e8/0x4c0
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff811ff0d0>] con_init+0x370/0x398
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff811fe3e0>] console_init+0x34/0x50
[   83.066406]   [<ffffffff811e4844>] start_kernel+0x2f8/0x4e0
[   83.066406] irq event stamp: 971
[   83.066406] hardirqs last  enabled at (971): [<ffffffff8021c384>] local_flush_tlb_all+0x134/0x17c
[   83.066406] hardirqs last disabled at (970): [<ffffffff8021c298>] local_flush_tlb_all+0x48/0x17c
[   83.066406] softirqs last  enabled at (0): [<ffffffff802298a4>] copy_process+0x510/0x117c
[   83.066406] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<          (null)>] (null)
[   83.066406]
[   83.066406] other info that might help us debug this:
[   83.066406]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   83.066406]
[   83.066406]        CPU0
[   83.066406]        ----
[   83.066406]   lock(&rq->lock);
[   83.066406]   <Interrupt>
[   83.066406]     lock(&rq->lock);
[   83.066406]
[   83.066406]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[   83.066406]
[   83.066406] no locks held by migration/1/7.
[   83.066406]
[   83.066406] stack backtrace:
[   83.066406] Call Trace:
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff80747544>] dump_stack+0x8/0x34
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff8027ba04>] print_usage_bug+0x2ec/0x314
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff8027be28>] mark_lock+0x3fc/0x774
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff8027ca48>] __lock_acquire+0x8a8/0x1cc0
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff8027e3d0>] lock_acquire+0x60/0x9c
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff8074ba04>] _raw_spin_lock+0x3c/0x50
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff802585ac>] sched_ttwu_pending+0x64/0x98
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff80745ff4>] migration_call+0x10c/0x2e0
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff80253110>] notifier_call_chain+0x44/0x94
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff8022eae0>] __cpu_notify+0x30/0x5c
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff8072b598>] take_cpu_down+0x5c/0x70
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff80299ba4>] stop_machine_cpu_stop+0x104/0x1e8
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff802997cc>] cpu_stopper_thread+0x110/0x1ac
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff8024c940>] kthread+0x88/0x90
[   83.066406] [<ffffffff80205ee4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x10/0x18

Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhc@...ote.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c |    5 +++--
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 36e2666..703754a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1468,9 +1468,10 @@ static void sched_ttwu_pending(void)
 {
 	struct rq *rq = this_rq();
 	struct llist_node *llist = llist_del_all(&rq->wake_list);
+	unsigned long flags;
 	struct task_struct *p;
 
-	raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
 
 	while (llist) {
 		p = llist_entry(llist, struct task_struct, wake_entry);
@@ -1478,7 +1479,7 @@ static void sched_ttwu_pending(void)
 		ttwu_do_activate(rq, p, 0);
 	}
 
-	raw_spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);
 }
 
 void scheduler_ipi(void)
-- 
1.7.7.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ