| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:19:59 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86: Provide a comment in uapi/asm/hw_breakpoint.h * David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote: > Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote: > > > Just wondering, have the tools/perf/ issues been solved in your > > tree, are the x86 UAPI disintegration changes pullable? > > Did you have a look at the set of five patches I sent? I > think those should fix up perf and building tools with O=, but > I'm not sure whether we want the last two. From commits > already made, I'm guessing that at least patch #4 should be > made. > > Note that the disintegrate-x86 branch does not include any > perf fixes. I can regenerate that with some or all of them, > once I know what they will be. Just wanted to inquire about the current status of it, as I'd rather not pull anything that introduces breakages and is still work in progress. Once it's all sorted out I'll have a look. Arnaldo, what's your take on David's perf Makefile changes? Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists