linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v4 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:48:55 +0000
From:	Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
To:	Josh Cartwright <josh.cartwright@...com>
CC:	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	John Linn <linnj@...inx.com>,
	Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Josh Cartwright [mailto:josh.cartwright@...com]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 2:36 PM
> To: Michal Simek
> Cc: arm@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; John Linn; Nick Bowler; Arnd Bergmann
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups
> 
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 07:24:16AM +0000, Michal Simek wrote:
> > Hi Josh,
> >
> > > Michal-
> > >
> > > Here is a v5 of the zynq cleanup patchset that addresses your
> > > feedback.  I've intentionally left patches 4 and 5 in the set until
> > > we figure out the appropriate way to get them in tree (feel free to
> > > just apply 1-3)
> >
> > I am ok to pick just several patches from your patchset. But this is
> > no definitely good working style. Not expert for submission process
> > but I think that if there is one broken patch maintainer shouldn't
> > apply it.  Can someone else check this?
> 
> It turns out that with the change to patch 5 to map the uart to a known working
> address (instead of VMALLOC_END - 0x1000), patch 4 isn't needed, and as such
> can be dropped.  (I didn't realize this until this morning until I had saw you had
> applied 1-3,5 to your tree, but not 4).
> 
> So, for what it's worth, you've applied all of the relevant patches for this
> patchset.

Ok. Great.

Thanks,
MIchal


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/