| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 22:31:01 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>, ZhangRui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
jiang.liu@...wei.com, izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com,
isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] Improve container_notify_cb() to support container hot-remove.
On Thursday, November 01, 2012 01:16:22 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 01, 2012 01:17:58 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2012-11-01 at 11:28 -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > Rafael pointed out in my CPU hot-remove patch that
> >> > > acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() was not exported for modules. Looks like
> >> > > you have the same problem here. FYI, I just sent the following patch
> >> > > that exports acpi_bus_hot_remove_device() and acpi_os_hotplug_execute().
> >> > >
> >> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/1/225
> >> >
> >> > acpi_os_hotplug_execute() does not like having good quality yet.
> >> >
> >> > c02256be (Zhang Rui 2009-06-23 10:20:29 +0800 941) /*
> >> > c02256be (Zhang Rui 2009-06-23 10:20:29 +0800 942) * We
> >> > can't run hotplug code in keventd_wq/kacpid_wq/kacpid_notify_wq
> >> > c02256be (Zhang Rui 2009-06-23 10:20:29 +0800 943) *
> >> > because the hotplug code may call driver .remove() functions,
> >> > c02256be (Zhang Rui 2009-06-23 10:20:29 +0800 944) *
> >> > which invoke flush_scheduled_work/acpi_os_wait_events_complete
> >> > c02256be (Zhang Rui 2009-06-23 10:20:29 +0800 945) * to
> >> > flush these workqueues.
> >> > c02256be (Zhang Rui 2009-06-23 10:20:29 +0800 946) */
> >> > c02256be (Zhang Rui 2009-06-23 10:20:29 +0800 947) queue
> >> > = hp ? kacpi_hotplug_wq :
> >> > c02256be (Zhang Rui 2009-06-23 10:20:29 +0800 948)
> >> > (type == OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER ? kacpi_notify_wq : kacpid_wq);
> >> > 9ac61856 (Bjorn Helgaas 2009-08-31 22:32:10 +0000 949)
> >> > dpc->wait = hp ? 1 : 0;
> >> > bc73675b (Zhang Rui 2010-03-22 15:48:54 +0800 950)
> >> > bc73675b (Zhang Rui 2010-03-22 15:48:54 +0800 951) if
> >> > (queue == kacpi_hotplug_wq)
> >> > bc73675b (Zhang Rui 2010-03-22 15:48:54 +0800 952)
> >> > INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
> >> > bc73675b (Zhang Rui 2010-03-22 15:48:54 +0800 953) else
> >> > if (queue == kacpi_notify_wq)
> >> > bc73675b (Zhang Rui 2010-03-22 15:48:54 +0800 954)
> >> > INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
> >> > bc73675b (Zhang Rui 2010-03-22 15:48:54 +0800 955) else
> >> > bc73675b (Zhang Rui 2010-03-22 15:48:54 +0800 956)
> >> > INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
> >> > bc73675b (Zhang Rui 2010-03-22 15:48:54 +0800 957)
> >> >
> >> > really don't know why checking queue and call same code in every branch.
> >> >
> >> > from comm:
> >> >
> >> > commit bc73675b99fd9850dd914be01d71af99c5d2a1ae
> >> > Author: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> >> > Date: Mon Mar 22 15:48:54 2010 +0800
> >> >
> >> > ACPI: fixes a false alarm from lockdep
> >> >
> >> > fixes a false alarm from lockdep, as acpi hotplug workqueue waits other
> >> > workqueues.
> >> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14553
> >> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15521
> >> >
> >> > Original-patch-from: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/osl.c b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> >> > index 8e6d866..900da68 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/osl.c
> >> > @@ -758,7 +758,14 @@ static acpi_status
> >> > __acpi_os_execute(acpi_execute_type type,
> >> > queue = hp ? kacpi_hotplug_wq :
> >> > (type == OSL_NOTIFY_HANDLER ? kacpi_notify_wq : kacpid_wq);
> >> > dpc->wait = hp ? 1 : 0;
> >> > - INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
> >> > +
> >> > + if (queue == kacpi_hotplug_wq)
> >> > + INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
> >> > + else if (queue == kacpi_notify_wq)
> >> > + INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
> >> > + else
> >> > + INIT_WORK(&dpc->work, acpi_os_execute_deferred);
> >> > +
> >> > ret = queue_work(queue, &dpc->work);
> >> >
> >> > if (!ret) {
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Len or Rafael,
> >> > can you just revert that silly patch?
> >>
> >> Hi Yinghai,
> >>
> >> Per the following thread, the code seems to be written in this way to
> >> allocate a separate lock_class_key for each work queue. It should have
> >> had some comment to explain this, though.
> >>
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/13/304
> >
> > The code has evolved since then, however, so that it doesn't make sense
> > any more.
> >
>
> oh, no, that commit should not be reverted. instead we should add some
> comment for it...
>
> that mean : three path, will have three separated static lock dep key
> from every INIT_WORK.
I see.
OK, I'll drop the patch removing it.
What about the following comment:
"To prevent lockdep from complaining unnecessarily, make sure that there
is a different static lockdep key created for each workqueue by using
INIT_WORK for each of them separately."
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists