linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Use acpi_os_hotplug_execute() instead of alloc_acpi_hp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:07:27 +0800
From:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC:	bhelgaas@...gle.com, lenb@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com,
	izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] Use acpi_os_hotplug_execute() instead of alloc_acpi_hp_work().

On 11/01/2012 11:52 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tang Chen<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>  wrote:
> Please check if you can just fold
>     acpi_hp_cb_execute
> callers, and use acpi_os_hotplug_execute directly.
>
> and have two local conext struct too.
>
I think this could bring some duplicated work. We need to do the same
work every time we call acpi_os_hotplug_execute(), what has been done
in acpi_hp_cb_execute().

I can try to modify it and resend a new patch to see if it is better.

Thanks. :)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/