| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2012 18:40:58 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: thierry.reding@...onic-design.de Cc: sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org, grant.likely@...retlab.ca, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: SPARC and OF_GPIO From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...onic-design.de> Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 10:53:15 +0100 > Are you aware of any reasons why this conflict would still be necessary? No reason that I can see, I'll push something like the patch below via the sparc tree. > This is not only the case for OF_GPIO but likely also for OF_SPI, > OF_I2C, OF_IRQ and OF_ADDRESS. Shouldn't those all work even on SPARC > nowadays? Those also would need to be tested on an individual basis, but there are no fundamental problems that I am aware of. diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig index b6b442b..f0a5391 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@ config SPARC default y select OF select OF_PROMTREE + select OF_GPIO select HAVE_IDE select HAVE_OPROFILE select HAVE_ARCH_KGDB if !SMP || SPARC64 diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig index d055cee..f11d8e3 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ if GPIOLIB config OF_GPIO def_bool y - depends on OF && !SPARC + depends on OF config DEBUG_GPIO bool "Debug GPIO calls" -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists