linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] fat: fix time updates for create and delete

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2012 18:21:04 +0900
From:	OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
To:	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] fat: fix time updates for create and delete

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> writes:

>>> What was difference with XFS, FAT, and MSDOS?
> Okay, the description of patch was lacked, So I will resend patch with
> specifical test reseult with other filesystem.
>>
>> BTW, I recall I checked this, and yes, it is strange. But it is historical.
> "historical" means It is difficult to change ?

The timestamp handling was not same with unix fs from initial, and FAT
doesn't have inode change timestamp.  This historical reason it is not
better to change to same with unix fs, and never be possible to support
inode change timestamp cleanly.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/