linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/31] Latest numa/core patches, v15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 13 Nov 2012 17:54:28 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/31] Latest numa/core patches, v15

On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 06:13:23PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is the latest iteration of our numa/core tree, which
> implements adaptive NUMA affinity balancing.
> 
> Changes in this version:
> 
>     https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/12/315
> 
> Performance figures:
> 
>     https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/11/12/330
> 
> Any review feedback, comments and test results are welcome!
> 

For the purposes of review and testing, this is going to be hard to pick
apart and compare. It doesn't apply against 3.7-rc5 and when trying to
resolve the conflicts it quickly becomes obvious that the series depends
on other scheduler patches such as

sched: Add an rq migration call-back to sched_class
sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking

This is not a full list, it was just the first I hit. What are the other
scheduler patches you are depend on? Knowing that will probably help pick
apart some of the massive patches like "sched, numa, mm: Add adaptive
NUMA affinity support" which is a massive monolithic patch I have not even
attempted to read yet but the diffstat for it alone says a lot.

7 files changed, 901 insertions(+), 197 deletions(-)

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/