linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dw_dmac: make usage of dw_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2012 19:58:41 +0200
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	spear-devel <spear-devel@...t.st.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dw_dmac: make usage of dw_dma_slave optional

On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:38 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 15 November 2012 20:57, Andy Shevchenko
> <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Well, the prep_* should assign the value due to changes of check in the
>> dwc_descriptor_complete. Otherwise we will potentially skip some
>> important piece of code.
>
> What i meant to say was, set_runtime_config() must have already done this part.

On one hand it is true. On the other - *_prep* functions use
explicitly passed parameter. I doubt there is a consistency between
value in slave config passed via dwc_control and value passed as
explicit function parameter.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/