linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 11:17:02 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci tree

On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 09:52:40 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in
> > arch/x86/pci/acpi.c between commit 3f385fa9edce ("x86/PCI: Ignore _SEG on
> > HP xw9300") from the pci tree and commit 97a7108a3c00 ("ACPI / x86: Add
> > quirk for "CheckPoint P-20-00" to not use bridge _CRS_ info") from the pm
> > tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> > is required).
> 
> My opinion was that we should just drop the CheckPoint quirk.  See
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47981#c36 for my
> rationale.

OK, I agree.  I'll revert that commit, then.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/