lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:49:18 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: Benchmark results: "Enhanced NUMA scheduling with adaptive
 affinity"


* Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 04:56:26PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > It is important to know how this was configured. I was running 
> > > one JVM per node and the JVMs were sized that they should fit 
> > > in the node. [...]
> > 
> > That is not what I tested: as I described it in the mail I 
> > tested 32 warehouses: i.e. spanning the whole system.
> > 
> 
> Good (sortof) [...]

Not just 'sortof' good but it appears it's unconditionally good: 
meanwhile other testers have reproduced the single-JVM speedup 
with the latest numa/core code as well, so the speedup is not 
just on my system.

Please post your kernel .config so I can check why the 4x JVM 
test does not perform so well on your system. Maybe there's 
something special to your system.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ