linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c: eliminate possible double power off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 20:18:14 +0200
From:	Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
To:	Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
CC:	<kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	<linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c: eliminate
 possible double power off

On Sun, 2012-10-21 at 12:52 +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...6.fr>
> 
> The function wl12xx_set_power_on is only called twice, once in
> wl12xx_chip_wakeup and once in wl12xx_get_hw_info.  On the failure of the
> call in wl12xx_chip_wakeup, the containing function just returns, but on
> the failure of the call in wl12xx_get_hw_info, the containing function
> calls wl1271_power_off.  This does not seem necessary, because if
> wl12xx_set_power_on has set the power on and then fails, it has already
> turned the power off.

[...]

Applied and pushed, thanks!

--
Luca.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/