linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/ftrace: Use __pa_symbol instead of _

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2012 18:30:30 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] x86/ftrace: Use __pa_symbol instead of __pa on C
 visible symbols

On Fri, 2012-11-16 at 15:06 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 11/16/2012 02:45 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > #define __pa(x)		__phys_addr((unsigned long)(x))
> > #define __pa_symbol(x)	__pa(__phys_reloc_hide((unsigned long)(x)))
> >
> > I'm confused. __pa_symbol() just calls __pa() with some macro magic to
> > its parameter. How is this a performance improvement?
> >
> 
> One of the earlier patches in this series changes __pa_symbol() to avoid 
> the conditional hidden inside __phys_addr(), since by definition a 
> symbol can only be on one side of that branch.
> 

Ah I missed the 6/8 reference and haven't looked at the rest of the
series.

OK, this makes sense now.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/