linux-kernel - Re: sigaltstack fun

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2012 01:10:13 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, monstr@...str.eu,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sigaltstack fun

On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 04:18:33PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 21:02:53 +0000
> 
> > Are you OK with the patch below?  Should be the minimal fix, getting
> > rid of those segfaults and converting to usual semantics here...
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> 
> Yep, looks fine:
> 
> Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>

Er...  So which tree should that go through?  sparc or signal?  There's
a similar microblaze patch and a few more of the "do_sigaltstack() takes
userland pointer" variety, so I can put together a pile in
signal.git#for-linus, but if you prefer that to go through sparc tree,
I'm fine with that...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/