linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: dgrp: dgrp_tty.c: Audit the return values of get/put

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2012 18:38:29 +0530
From:	Kumar amit mehta <gmate.amit@...il.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	wfp5p@...ginia.edu, geert@...ux-m68k.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: dgrp: dgrp_tty.c: Audit the return values of
 get/put_user()

On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 02:15:54PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 04:25:31PM +0530, Kumar Amit Mehta wrote:
> > -- fix for missing audits for return values of get_user() and put_user().
> > -- Remove the TIOCSSOFTCAR ioctl handling from dgrp driver.
> 
> These should be done in separate commits.
> 
> Are the calls to access_ok() still needed if we check get_user() and
> put_user()?
>
You are right, access_ok() would become redundant if we check get/put_user().
Also, After sending one patch for removing TIOCSSOFTCAR ioctl handler from dgrp
driver, I realized that I should be sending two patches as patch series. Please
correct me if I'm wrong.

Regards,
Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/