linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] x86: Add macro for 64bit entry startup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Nov 2012 15:55:45 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/13] x86: Add macro for 64bit entry startup_64

We probably should add a flag for those, but that is more of a boot_flag...

Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:

>On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 3:13 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> On 11/19/2012 02:53 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> any other field, in header struct field that we can use to tell
>>> bzImage could be used that
>>> 0x200 directly?
>>>
>>> hardware_subarch?
>>>
>>
>> There isn't one... this dates back all the way to the original x86-64
>> kernels.
>>
>> Are you asking if we can tell this is a 64-bit kernel (as opposed to
>a
>> 32-bit kernel, which obviously doesn't have a 64-bit entry point)?
>> Unfortunately there isn't an intentional one that I know of.  There
>> might be an accidental such indicator, but we'd have to go back to
>look
>> at 8+ years of kernels.  We can't even rely on a jmp instruction at
>the
>> address...
>
>So we could add one field to tell that bzImage could be used with
>64bit?
>
>current in this patchset, I added
>
>0268/4  2.12+   ext_ramdisk_image ramdisk_image 32 bits
>026C/4  2.12+   ext_ramdisk_size ramdisk_size high 32 bits
>0270/4  2.12+   code64_start_offset 64bit start offset for bzImage
>0274/4  2.12+   ext_cmd_line_ptr cmd_line_ptr high 32 bits
>
>so you don't like code64_start_offset.
>
>how about other three?
>
>can we use bits 31 of hardware_subarch to tell it is bzImage for
>x86_64?
>
>Thanks
>
>Yinghai

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/