lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 22 Nov 2012 09:21:43 -1000
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Recent kernel "mount" slow

Doesn't sound like a fsdevel issue since it seems to be independent of
filesystems. More like some generic block layer thing. Adding Jens
(and quoting the whole thing)

Jens, any ideas? Most of your stuff came in after -rc2, which would
fit with the fact that most of the slowdown seems to be after -rc2
according to Jeff.

Jeff, more bisecting would be good, though.

                 Linus

On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 4:30 AM, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Jeff Chua <jeff.chua.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> wrote:
>>>   I haven't heard about such problem so far. What filesystem are you using?
>>
>> I've tried ext2/ext3/ext4/reiserfs/btrfs ... all seems to be slower
>> than before. Seems to be fs independent.
>>
>>> Can you quantify 'is slower'? Bisecting would be welcome of course.
>>
>> Haven't measure, but it seems to be 1 sec instead of .3 sec to mount.
>> I'll start bisecting:(
>> So, since I've 6 mounts on start up, now it takes 4 seconds longer to boot up.
>
> I started bisecting, and it seems to have multiple points of slowing
> down. The latest kernel is really slow mounting /dev/sda1 (fs
> independent) ... 0.529sec. Kernel 3.6.0 took 0.012sec, Kernel
> 3.7.0-rc2 took 0.168sec. Again, these are very early results. I'm
> verifying them again.
>
>
> Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ