lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:40:30 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>,
	Alex Elder <elder@...tank.com>
Subject: [ 084/171] libceph: use con get/put ops from osd_client

3.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sage Weil <sage@...tank.com>

(cherry picked from commit 0d47766f14211a73eaf54cab234db134ece79f49)

There were a few direct calls to ceph_con_{get,put}() instead of the con
ops from osd_client.c.  This is a bug since those ops aren't defined to
be ceph_con_get/put.

This breaks refcounting on the ceph_osd structs that contain the
ceph_connections, and could lead to all manner of strangeness.

The purpose of the ->get and ->put methods in a ceph connection are
to allow the connection to indicate it has a reference to something
external to the messaging system, *not* to indicate something
external has a reference to the connection.

[elder@...tank.com: added that last sentence]

Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@...dream.net>
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...tank.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 88ed6ea0b295f8e2383d599a04027ec596cdf97b)
---
 net/ceph/osd_client.c |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ceph/osd_client.c
+++ b/net/ceph/osd_client.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ void ceph_osdc_release_request(struct kr
 		     req->r_pages, req->r_con_filling_msg);
 		ceph_con_revoke_message(req->r_con_filling_msg,
 				      req->r_reply);
-		ceph_con_put(req->r_con_filling_msg);
+		req->r_con_filling_msg->ops->put(req->r_con_filling_msg);
 	}
 	if (req->r_reply)
 		ceph_msg_put(req->r_reply);
@@ -1216,7 +1216,7 @@ static void handle_reply(struct ceph_osd
 	if (req->r_con_filling_msg == con && req->r_reply == msg) {
 		dout(" dropping con_filling_msg ref %p\n", con);
 		req->r_con_filling_msg = NULL;
-		ceph_con_put(con);
+		con->ops->put(con);
 	}
 
 	if (!req->r_got_reply) {
@@ -2028,7 +2028,7 @@ static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct
 		dout("get_reply revoking msg %p from old con %p\n",
 		     req->r_reply, req->r_con_filling_msg);
 		ceph_con_revoke_message(req->r_con_filling_msg, req->r_reply);
-		ceph_con_put(req->r_con_filling_msg);
+		req->r_con_filling_msg->ops->put(req->r_con_filling_msg);
 		req->r_con_filling_msg = NULL;
 	}
 
@@ -2063,7 +2063,7 @@ static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct
 #endif
 	}
 	*skip = 0;
-	req->r_con_filling_msg = ceph_con_get(con);
+	req->r_con_filling_msg = con->ops->get(con);
 	dout("get_reply tid %lld %p\n", tid, m);
 
 out:


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ