| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 22:05:53 -0800
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Cc: 'Doug Anderson' <dianders@...omium.org>,
'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
'Russell King' <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: Avoid early use of
of_machine_is_compatible()
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 02:23:09PM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Olof Johansson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com> wrote:
> > > On 11/28/12 07:11, Olof Johansson wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Doug Anderson<dianders@...omium.org>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> The recent commit "ARM: EXYNOS: add support for EXYNOS5440 SoC" broke
> > >>> support for exynos5250 because of_machine_is_compatible() was used too
> > >>> early in the boot process. It also probably meant that the exynos5440
> > >>> failed to use the proper iotable. Switch to use
> > >>> of_flat_dt_is_compatible() in both of these cases.
> > >>>
> > >>> The failure I was seeing in exynos5250 because of this was:
> > >>> Division by zero in kernel.
> > >>> [<80015ed4>] (unwind_backtrace+0x0/0xec) from [<8045c7a4>]
> > >>> (dump_stack+0x20/0x24)
> > >>> [<8045c7a4>] (dump_stack+0x20/0x24) from [<80012990>]
> > >>> (__div0+0x20/0x28)
> > >>> [<80012990>] (__div0+0x20/0x28) from [<8021ab04>]
> (Ldiv0_64+0x8/0x18)
> > >>> [<8021ab04>] (Ldiv0_64+0x8/0x18) from [<80068560>]
> > >>> (__clocksource_updatefreq_scale+0x54/0x134)
> > >>> [<80068560>] (__clocksource_updatefreq_scale+0x54/0x134) from
> > >>> [<8006865c>] (__clocksource_register_scale+0x1c/0x54)
> > >>> [<8006865c>] (__clocksource_register_scale+0x1c/0x54) from
> > >>> [<80612a18>] (exynos_timer_init+0x100/0x1e8)
> > >>> [<80612a18>] (exynos_timer_init+0x100/0x1e8) from [<8060d184>]
> > >>> (time_init+0x28/0x38)
> > >>> [<8060d184>] (time_init+0x28/0x38) from [<8060a754>]
> > >>> (start_kernel+0x1e0/0x3c8)
> > >>> [<8060a754>] (start_kernel+0x1e0/0x3c8) from [<40008078>]
> > (0x40008078)
> > >>>
> > >>> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson<dianders@...omium.org>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Thanks Doug.
> > >>
> > >> Kukjin, I'll apply this directly on top of the previous branch in
> > >> arm-soc, if that's OK with you.
> > >>
> > > Sure, go ahead with my ack if you want,
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
> > >
> > > Note, actually there was a fix which uses soc_is_exynos5440() in my
> > local
> > > :-) I'm not sure which one is better at this moment, but I'm OK on this.
> >
> > Ok, applied. Thanks all.
> >
> Olof, just note, happens build error with exynos4_defconfig because of
> non-DT.
Ick, thanks for catching that.
>
> Following can resolve it or we should create null function for
> of_get_flat_dt_root() and of_flat_dt_is_compatible()...
>
> 8<---------------------------------------
> From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
> Subject: ARM: EXYNOS: fix a build error with non-DT for exynos4
>
> This fixes following in case of non-DT:
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c: In function 'exynos_init_io':
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c:339: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'of_get_flat_dt_root'
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c:342: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'of_flat_dt_is_compatible'
> make[1]: *** [arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.o] Error 1
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
> index b919f5f..2110091 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
> @@ -336,12 +336,14 @@ void __init exynos_init_late(void)
>
> void __init exynos_init_io(struct map_desc *mach_desc, int size)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> unsigned long root = of_get_flat_dt_root();
>
> /* initialize the io descriptors we need for initialization */
> if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(root, "samsung,exynos5440"))
> iotable_init(exynos5440_iodesc,
> ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5440_iodesc));
> else
> +#endif
> iotable_init(exynos_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_iodesc));
I really don't like splitting an if/else with an ifdef like this, it's fragile
code and can be hard to follow.
There's also a second build error with exynos_defconfig in the
exynos5-dt.c board file due to a missing include. Teaches me to just apply
patches without trying to build. :(
I'll squash this into Doug's original patch, if that's OK?
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
index 796e0c9..77e7c5b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/common.c
@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static struct map_desc exynos_iodesc[] __initdata = {
},
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS5
static struct map_desc exynos5440_iodesc[] __initdata = {
{
.virtual = (unsigned long)S5P_VA_CHIPID,
@@ -130,6 +131,7 @@ static struct map_desc exynos5440_iodesc[] __initdata = {
.type = MT_DEVICE,
},
};
+#endif
static struct map_desc exynos4_iodesc[] __initdata = {
{
@@ -347,13 +349,19 @@ void __init exynos_init_late(void)
void __init exynos_init_io(struct map_desc *mach_desc, int size)
{
+ struct map_desc *iodesc = exynos_iodesc;
+ int iodesc_sz = ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_iodesc);
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
unsigned long root = of_get_flat_dt_root();
/* initialize the io descriptors we need for initialization */
- if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(root, "samsung,exynos5440"))
- iotable_init(exynos5440_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5440_iodesc));
- else
- iotable_init(exynos_iodesc, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_iodesc));
+ if (of_flat_dt_is_compatible(root, "samsung,exynos5440")) {
+ iodesc = exynos5440_iodesc;
+ iodesc_sz = ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5440_iodesc);
+ }
+#endif
+
+ iotable_init(iodesc, iodesc_sz);
if (mach_desc)
iotable_init(mach_desc, size);
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c
index 2a75624..f1326be 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/mach-exynos5-dt.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
*/
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
#include <linux/serial_core.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists