linux-kernel - Re: MIPS Function Tracer question

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 03 Dec 2012 12:50:56 -0500
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Cc:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
	Alan Cooper <alcooperx@...il.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MIPS Function Tracer question

On Mon, 2012-12-03 at 17:13 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2012 at 09:40:48AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> > The issue is with x86. Gcc wont compile if you have -pg and
> > -fomit-frame-pointer on x86. I originally forced function tracing to
> > select FRAME_POINTER, but because now on x86 with -mfentry, -pg no
> > longer requires frame pointers being set, I just let -pg complain one
> > way or the other. I believe that gcc by default will not add frame
> > pointers. Thus adding function tracing just prevents
> > -fomit-frame-pointer from being set, and if -pg requires frame pointers
> > it will automatically enable them otherwise they should not be enabled.
> 
> On architectures such as MIPS where a frame pointer is not required for
> debugging -O and higher imply -fomit-frame-pointer.

Then this shouldn't be an issue for MIPS.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/