lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2012 10:53:24 +0800
From:	Chao Xie <xiechao.mail@...il.com>
To:	Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc:	Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
	rtc-linux@...glegroups.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	haojian.zhuang@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] rtc: pxa: fix rtc caculation issue

On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Chao Xie <xiechao.mail@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:04 AM, Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr> wrote:
>> Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com> writes:
>>
>> Hi Chao Xie,
>>
>> First of all, could you please send patches from rtc-pxa to me also, as I'm
>> maintaining that driver ?
>>
>> Second point, the original design of the driver relies on the special case of
>> writing zeroes to WOM and DOM, as mentionned in PXA27x Developers Guide, chapter
>> 21.4.2.3.5 "Writing Alarm Registers with Invalid (Zero) Data", which states :
>>> Day-Of-Week (DOW), or Week-Of-Month (WOM), Day of Month (DOM), Month or Year
>>> fields—Zero is not valid for these fields. If zero is written into any of
>>> these fields, it is ignored while generating the alarm.
>>
>> I'd like to know if your patch fixes something, or is an enhancement ?
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>> --
>> Robert
>>
>> PS: I've not checked the patch yet, that's just a prelimary comment on the patch
>> message.
>
> hi
> I am sorry, i just use get_maintainer.pl to get the "to" list.
> I have go through the spec. The spec has the desctiption about the
> invalid data writing.
> I am a little confused about the "wrting 0 to DOW". The descrption is
> confused. first it said that "If zero is written into any of these
> fields, it is ignored
> while generating the alarm", then it gives a example, that if writing
> 0 to DOW, "For example, if a zero is written into a DOW field, the
> alarm is set
> every day at the time written in the Hours, Minutes, and Seconds
> field”. It seems that the Year/Month/Week will not take effect.
> I will do the test on the board again, and send out the update.

hi, Robert
You are right. it does not matter to set WOM and DOW. please ignore this patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ