linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] synclink fix ldisc buffer argument

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Dec 2012 09:35:11 +0800
From:	Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To:	Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
CC:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] synclink fix ldisc buffer argument

于 2012年12月04日 01:13, Paul Fulghum 写道:
> Fix call to line discipline receive_buf by synclink drivers.
> Dummy flag buffer argument is ignored by N_HDLC line discipline but might
> be of insufficient size if accessed by a different line discipline
> selected by mistake. flag buffer allocation now matches max size of data
> buffer. Unused char_buf buffers are removed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Paul Fulghum <paulkf@...rogate.com>
> 

  thank you very much.


  might we use macro instead of hard code number ? (such as 4096,
65535). it is only an idea, not means need regression.

  thanks.

-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/