linux-kernel - [PATCH] sched: Fix task_numa

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Dec 2012 13:44:58 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
	Alex Shi <lkml.alex@...il.com>,
	Aneesh Kumar <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Fix task_numa_fault() + KSM crash

Srikar Dronamraju reported that the following assert triggers on 
his box:

   kernel BUG at ../kernel/sched/fair.c:2371!

   Call Trace:
     [<ffffffff8113cd0e>] __do_numa_page+0xde/0x160
     [<ffffffff8113de9e>] handle_pte_fault+0x32e/0xcd0
     [<ffffffffa01c22c0>] ? drop_large_spte+0x30/0x30 [kvm]
     [<ffffffffa01bf215>] ? kvm_set_spte_hva+0x25/0x30 [kvm]
     [<ffffffff8113eab9>] handle_mm_fault+0x279/0x760
     [<ffffffff8115c024>] break_ksm+0x74/0xa0
     [<ffffffff8115c222>] break_cow+0xa2/0xb0
     [<ffffffff8115e38c>] ksm_scan_thread+0xb5c/0xd50
     [<ffffffff810771c0>] ? wake_up_bit+0x40/0x40
     [<ffffffff8115d830>] ? run_store+0x340/0x340
     [<ffffffff8107692e>] kthread+0xce/0xe0

This means that task_numa_fault() was called for a kernel thread
which has no fault tracking.

This scenario is actually possible if a kernel thread does
fault processing on behalf of a user-space task - ignore
the page fault in that case.

Also remove the (now never triggering) assert and robustify
a nearby assert.

Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 9d11a8a..61c7a10 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2351,6 +2351,13 @@ void task_numa_fault(unsigned long addr, int node, int last_cpupid, int pages, b
 	int priv;
 	int idx;
 
+	/*
+	 * Kernel threads might not have an mm but might still
+	 * do fault processing (such as KSM):
+	 */
+	if (!p->numa_faults)
+		return;
+
 	if (last_cpupid != cpu_pid_to_cpupid(-1, -1)) {
 		/* Did we access it last time around? */
 		if (last_pid == this_pid) {
@@ -2367,8 +2374,8 @@ void task_numa_fault(unsigned long addr, int node, int last_cpupid, int pages, b
 
 	idx = 2*node + priv;
 
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(last_cpu == -1 || node == -1);
-	BUG_ON(!p->numa_faults);
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(last_cpu == -1 || node == -1))
+		return;
 
 	p->numa_faults_curr[idx] += pages;
 	shared_fault_tick(p, node, last_cpu, pages);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/