linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2] Add mempressure cgroup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:05:12 -0800
From:	Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
To:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
Cc:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
	Leonid Moiseichuk <leonid.moiseichuk@...ia.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...aro.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v2] Add mempressure cgroup

On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 01:23:09PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Monday 10 December 2012 10:58:38 Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> 
> > +static void consume_memory(void)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int i = 0;
> > +	unsigned int j = 0;
> > +
> > +	puts("consuming memory...");
> > +
> > +	while (1) {
> > +		pthread_mutex_lock(&locks[i]);
> > +		if (!chunks[i]) {
> > +			chunks[i] = malloc(CHUNK_SIZE);
> > +			pabort(!chunks[i], 0, "chunks alloc failed");
> > +			memset(chunks[i], 0, CHUNK_SIZE);
> > +			j++;
> > +		}
> > +		pthread_mutex_unlock(&locks[i]);
> > +
> > +		if (j >= num_chunks / 10) {
> > +			add_reclaimable(num_chunks / 10);
> 
> Shouldn't it use j instead of num_chunks / 10 here?

Um.. They should be equal. Or am I missing the point?

> > +			printf("added %d reclaimable chunks\n", j);
> > +			j = 0;

Here, we reset it.

> > +		}
> > +
> > +		i = (i + 1) % num_chunks;
> > +	}
> > +}

Thanks!
Anton.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/