[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 10:40:21 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, spear-devel@...t.st.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/3] dmaengine: dw_dmac: Enhance device tree support
On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 08:30 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > * It requires slave drivers to know that they are using the dw_dmac
> > driver and pass a pointer to dw_generic_filter, which is not
> > generic at all
> >
> > * It requires the dmac node to have information about all slaves
> >
> > There are also some minor issues, such as the naming of DT
> > properties, but the above need to be resolved first.
>
> I saw the binding document and it looks it can be applied to dw_dmac
> too, as there is nothing special for it.
>
> The question is how? We are already late for merge window and this
> one is queued. Supplying a new patch, getting it reviewed/tested and
> being pulled by Linus is not so easy :)
>
> Two ways:
> - Keep it as is, and i will fix it separately and quickly
> - Drop it :(
Will we survive if the patch is in mainline? I mean how big the impact
of it is?
--
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists