[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 13:31:46 +0100
From: Sjur BRENDELAND <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"sjur@...ndeland.net" <sjur@...ndeland.net>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com" <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: RE: [[PATCH v9 3/3] 1/1] virtio_console: Remove buffers from out_vq
at port removal
> Amit Shah [mailto:amit.shah@...hat.com] writes:
> On (Wed) 12 Dec 2012 [10:31:04], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com> writes:
> > > On (Tue) 11 Dec 2012 [09:39:41], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com> writes:
> > >> > On (Fri) 16 Nov 2012 [11:22:09], Rusty Russell wrote:
> > >> >> Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com> writes:
> > >> >> > From: Sjur Brændeland <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Remove buffers from the out-queue when a port is removed.
> Rproc_serial
> > >> >> > communicates with remote processors that may crash and leave
> buffers in
> > >> >> > the out-queue. The virtio serial ports may have buffers in the out-
> queue
> > >> >> > as well, e.g. for non-blocking ports and the host didn't consume
> them
> > >> >> > yet.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > [Amit: Remove WARN_ON for generic ports case.]
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Sjur Brændeland
> <sjur.brandeland@...ricsson.com>
> > >> >> > Signed-off-by: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I already have this in my pending queue; I've promoted it to my
> > >> >> virtio-next branch now.
> > >> >
> > >> > Rusty, I still see this series in your pending queue, not in
> > >> > virtio-next. Did anything change in the meantime?
> > >>
> > >> Hmm:
> > >>
> > >> 40e625ac50f40d87ddba93280d0a503425aa68e9?
> > >
> > > I'm sorry, I meant the remoteproc code, not this patch.
> >
> > Still waiting for v9, AFIACT?
>
> Instead of sending all patches marked v9, just this patch was
> re-spun. I think you can just pick up patches 1 and 2 from v8 (they
> have my acked-by), and patch 3 was an earlier version of this one,
Yes, that's right. V8 contained three patches, Amit did a respin of 3/3 that was applied.
(And I mistakenly thought 1/3 and 2/3 was applied as well).
Anyway I'm resending a new patch-set with the two missing patches.
The patches are identical to the V8, but are rebased to the virtio-next branch.
Sorry for the confusion here.
Regards,
Sjur
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists