lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 25 Dec 2012 19:42:07 -0500
From:	Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To:	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>,
	Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>,
	Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
	Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>,
	Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/29] net/: rename net_random() to prandom_u32()

On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 08:47:26PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> 2012/12/25 Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>:
> > On Mon, Dec 24, 2012 at 11:14:15AM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> >> Use more preferable function name which implies using a pseudo-random
> >> number generator.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
> >> Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@...ira.com>
> >> Cc: Venkat Venkatsubra <venkat.x.venkatsubra@...cle.com>
> >> Cc: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
> >> Cc: Sridhar Samudrala <sri@...ibm.com>
> >> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
> >> Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
> >> Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> >> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> >> Cc: linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org
> >> Cc: dev@...nvswitch.org
> >> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> >> ---
> >>  include/net/red.h         | 2 +-
> >>  net/802/garp.c            | 2 +-
> >>  net/openvswitch/actions.c | 2 +-
> >>  net/rds/bind.c            | 2 +-
> >>  net/sctp/socket.c         | 2 +-
> >>  net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c     | 2 +-
> >>  6 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >>
> > I'm largely indifferent to this patch, but I kind of feel like its just churn.
> > Whats the real advantage in making this change?  I grant that it clearly
> > indicates the type of random number generator we're using at a given call site,
> > But for those using net_random, you probably don't care too much about
> > the source of your random bits.  If you did really want true random vs.
> > pseudo-random data, you need to explicitly use the right call.  You're previous
> > patch series did good cleanup on differentiating the different random calls, but
> > this just seems like its removing what is otherwise useful indirection.
> 
> I overlooked the importance of  net_random() indirection.
> Thanks for the feedback. I'll leave all net_random() callers as-is in
> the next version.
Well, I guess I should qualify my opinion.  I find it useful personally (the
generation of nonces in many cases can be left to most any pseudo random
generator that the system deems is a 'good enough' balance between a fast
generator that doesn't block on low entropy and a reasonably secure one that
doesn't allow for easy prediction.  As those needs and factors change, its nice
to have a set point to change them at.  If you (or anyone else has a differing
opinion, I'm happy to listen to it.


Regards
Neil

> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ