linux-kernel - Re: [ 016/173] use clamp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 29 Dec 2012 00:07:43 -0800
From:	Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@...il.com>
To:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [ 016/173] use clamp_t in UNAME26 fix

Ben Hutchings wrote:

> The min/max call needed to have explicit types on some architectures
> (e.g. mn10300). Use clamp_t instead to avoid the warning:
> 
>   kernel/sys.c: In function 'override_release':
>   kernel/sys.c:1287:10: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast [enabled by default]
>
> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
[...]
> -		copy = min(sizeof(buf), max_t(size_t, 1, len));

I don't understand how this happens given that v2.6.36-rc1~68
(MN10300: Fix size_t and ssize_t, 2010-08-12) was supposed to fix this
kind of thing.  Doesn't sizeof(buf) have type size_t already (C99
§6.5.3.4 "the sizeof operator" ¶4)?

What version of gcc produces this warning?

Puzzled,
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/