[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2013 18:21:03 -0500
From: "Junchang(Jason) Wang" <junchang.wang@...e.edu>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andreas Voellmy <andreas.voellmy@...e.edu>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] poll: prevent missed events if _qproc is NULL
Hi all,
The alternate patch from Eric works well too. Even though I didn't see
a performance boost compared with the old version, this one is clearer
to me. Thanks your guys.
Cheers!
--Jason
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> An alternate version (limited to epoll) would be:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
>>> index cd96649..ca5f3d0 100644
>>> --- a/fs/eventpoll.c
>>> +++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
>>> @@ -1299,6 +1299,7 @@ static int ep_modify(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi, struct epoll_even
>>> * Get current event bits. We can safely use the file* here because
>>> * its usage count has been increased by the caller of this function.
>>> */
>>> + smp_mb();
>>> revents = epi->ffd.file->f_op->poll(epi->ffd.file, &pt);
>>>
>>> /*
>>
>> I was wrong, rereading 626cf236608505d376e4799adb4f7eb00a8594af,
>> I think this race existed before.
>>
>> Perhaps my alternate patch above is a better fix.
>
> Please document the barrier that this mb() pairs with, and then give
> an explanation for the fix in the commit message, and I'll happily
> take it. Even if it's just duplicating the comments above the
> wq_has_sleeper() function, except modified for the ep_modify() case.
>
> Of course, it would be good to get verification from Jason and Andreas
> that the alternate patch also works for them.
>
> Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists