| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 15:03:27 +1300 From: Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, vt8500-wm8505-linux-kernel@...glegroups.com, arm@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] arm: vt8500: Add support for Wondermedia WM8750/WM8850 On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 21:27 +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 09 January 2013, Tony Prisk wrote: > > I'm quite happy to send a pull request if that's what you prefer. > > > > Generally people have just taken the patches straight from email, so > > everytime I've done a pull-request I get a reply back saying the patches > > have already been applied. > > > > Is there some 'rule' around pull-requests vs emailed patches? > > Generally, pull requests tend to be less work for us, so I prefer > them. In particular, when you add a tag description or a signed > tag, that gives automatically puts nice text into the merge > changeset. > > > Should patches in pull-requests have Ack'd lines already? > > Yes. > > Arnd This is what I thought - and the reason I haven't sent a pull-request for the patch's - I haven't had any Ack's :) Regards Tony P -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists