linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 04/15] memory-hotplug: remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:07:37 +0800
From:	Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	rientjes@...gle.com, len.brown@...el.com, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	paulus@...ba.org, cl@...ux.com, minchan.kim@...il.com,
	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
	wujianguo@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com, hpa@...or.com,
	linfeng@...fujitsu.com, laijs@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de,
	yinghai@...nel.org, glommer@...allels.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, cmetcalf@...era.com,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/15] memory-hotplug: remove /sys/firmware/memmap/X
 sysfs

Hi Andrew,

On 01/10/2013 06:49 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2013 17:32:28 +0800
> Tang Chen<tangchen@...fujitsu.com>  wrote:
>
>> When (hot)adding memory into system, /sys/firmware/memmap/X/{end, start, type}
>> sysfs files are created. But there is no code to remove these files. The patch
>> implements the function to remove them.
>>
>> Note: The code does not free firmware_map_entry which is allocated by bootmem.
>>        So the patch makes memory leak. But I think the memory leak size is
>>        very samll. And it does not affect the system.
>
> Well that's bad.  Can we remember the address of that memory and then
> reuse the storage if/when the memory is re-added?  That at least puts an upper
> bound on the leak.

I think we can do this. I'll post a new patch to do so.

Thanks. :)

>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/