linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: fix new C-states not functional after AC disconnect

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 13 Jan 2013 21:49:00 +0100
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc:	Thomas Schlichter <thomas.schlichter@....de>,
	Linux PM List <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: fix new C-states not functional after AC disconnect

On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 9:44 PM, Daniel Lezcano
<daniel.lezcano@...aro.org> wrote:
> On 01/13/2013 09:36 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> 0001: Refreshed 1-2 as v3 against Linux v3.8-rc3.
>> 0002: v2 of 2-2 applied cleanly after 1-2 was refreshed!
>
> Hi Sedat,
>
> for the moment, you should use only the 1/2 because 2/2 (which is an
> optimization) is wrong.
>

Thanks, I wanted to test this cpuidle-fixes right now.

Just FYI:
Your original 1-2 (v2) patch does ***NOT*** apply against Linux v3.8-rc3!
I have sent a v3 already to the MLs.

- Sedat -

> Regards.
>
>   -- Daniel
>
>> Have fun!
>>
>> - Sedat -
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 13, 2013 at 8:30 PM, Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> I read your original LKML posting in [1].
>>>
>>> [ QUOTE ]
>>> Currently, Daniel Lezcano seems to be working on an intrusive change of not
>>> using the power_usage value at all for choosing a C-state:
>>>
>>> [4] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/155
>>>
>>> As I could not find any of these patches in any git trees to be merged for
>>> 3.8...
>>> [ /QUOTE ]
>>>
>>> You can find the patches at LKML ([2] and [3]) or patchwork ([4] and [5]).
>>>
>>> As a Linux-Next "customer" I know about Daniel's work for-next [5] but
>>> I did not found any other GIT repository of him.
>>> Striving through Daniel's other GIT repos I found idlestat [6] and
>>> powerdebug [7] tools which I want to test.
>>> ( So, thank you for your email! )
>>>
>>> Have fun!
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> - Sedat -
>>>
>>> [0] http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=135808048905350&w=2
>>> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/153
>>> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/12/14/149
>>> [3] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1878691/
>>> [4] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1878701/
>>> [5] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/dlezcano/cpuidle-next.git
>>> [6] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/dlezcano/idlestat.git;a=summary
>>> [7] http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/dlezcano/powerdebug.git;a=summary
>
>
> --
>  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
>
> Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
> <http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
> <http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/