linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] mfd/regulator: tps65090: add DT support and suspend/resume cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:29:38 +0900
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc:	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>, "lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
	"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org" 
	<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] mfd/regulator: tps65090: add DT support and
 suspend/resume cleanups

On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 05:55:42PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:

> I am not sure that the patches are created on correct sequence for
> adapting this in regulator subsystem and mfd subsystem.
> Can you please review whether the changes split is fine or not?
> Idea was to make independent patch for mfd and regulator so that
> they can apply independently.

The addition of pdata to the header means that they can't be applied
independantly but that's not the end of the world.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)