linux-kernel - Re: BUG at net/sunrpc/svc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:40:23 -0500
From:	Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
To:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
CC:	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921

On 13-01-17 08:53 AM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 08:11:52AM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
>> On 13-01-14 11:17 AM, Mark Lord wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's the code with the BUG() at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c line 921:
>>>
>>> /*
>>>  * Remove a dead transport
>>>  */
>>> static void svc_delete_xprt(struct svc_xprt *xprt)
>>> {
>>>         struct svc_serv *serv = xprt->xpt_server;
>>>         struct svc_deferred_req *dr;
>>>
>>>         /* Only do this once */
>>>         if (test_and_set_bit(XPT_DEAD, &xprt->xpt_flags))
>>>                 BUG();
>>
>>
>> Shouldn't there also be a return statement after the BUG() line,
>> inside the if-stmt ?
> 
> BUG() kills the thread that calls it

Oh, does it?  Well, taken care of then, I guess.
With a sledgehammer.

:)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/