linux-kernel - Re: BUG at net/sunrpc/svc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:37:02 +0400
From:	Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@...allels.com>
To:	Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
CC:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	<linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG at net/sunrpc/svc_xprt.c:921

18.01.2013 03:41, Mark Lord пишет:
> On 13-01-17 08:24 AM, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote:
> ..
>> This looks like the old issue I was trying to fix with "SUNRPC: protect service sockets lists during
>> per-net shutdown".
>> So, here is the problem as I see it: there is a transport, which is processed by service thread and
>> it's processing is racing with per-net service shutdown:
>>
>> CPU#0:                            CPU#1:
>>
>> svc_recv                        svc_close_net
>> svc_get_next_xprt (list_del_init(xpt_ready))
>>                              svc_close_list (set XPT_BUSY and XPT_CLOSE)
>>                              svc_clear_pools(xprt was gained on CPU#0 already)
>>                              svc_delete_xprt (set XPT_DEAD)
>> svc_handle_xprt (is XPT_CLOSE => svc_delete_xprt()
>> BUG()
>>
>> So, from my POW, we need some way to:
>> 1) Skip such in-progress transports on svc_close_net() call (there is not way to detect them, or at
>> least I don't see one)
>> 2) Delete the transport after somewhere after svc_xprt_received()
>>
>> But there is a problem with svc_xprt_received(): there is a call for svc_xprt_put() in it
>> (svc_recv->svc_handle_xprt->svc_xprt_received->svc_xprt_put) . And if we are the only user - then
>> the transport will be destroyed. But transport is dereferenced later in svc_recv() after the
>> svc_handle_xprt call.
>
> Sounds like a reference count type of problem/solution (kref) (?)
>

No, it would be very simple.
Unluckily, the problem is more complex. In few words, the problem is in dynamic resources (transports) creation/attaching
and destruction/detaching for running (!) SUNRPC service.
You have more than one NFS mount in different network namespaces, haven't you?

-- 
Best regards,
Stanislav Kinsbursky
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/