linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/1] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as special hypervisor interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 01:07:42 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"olaf@...fle.de" <olaf@...fle.de>,
	"apw@...onical.com" <apw@...onical.com>,
	"jasowang@...hat.com" <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as special
 hypervisor interrupts



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...uxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 7:24 PM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org; olaf@...fle.de;
> apw@...onical.com; jasowang@...hat.com; tglx@...utronix.de
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] X86: Handle Hyper-V vmbus interrupts as special
> hypervisor interrupts
> 
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:39:37PM -0800, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
> >
> > Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
> 
> No changelog entry describing the patch?

I sent the wrong version of the patch by mistake. I will send the one with the changelog shortly.
> 
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/irq_vectors.h |    2 +
> >  arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h    |    4 +++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mshyperv.c     |   39
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S         |    7 ++++++
> >  arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S         |    5 ++++
> >  5 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> This patch needs to go through the x86 maintainers, which you didn't
> include all of on the To: line, any reason why?
I have included Thomas as this was an interrupt related patch. I will however include x86 maintainers
when I resend with the change log.

Thank you,

K. Y
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/