linux-kernel - PAGE_CACHE_SIZE vs. PAGE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:57:25 +0200
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Subject: PAGE_CACHE_SIZE vs. PAGE_SIZE

Hi,

PAGE_CACHE_* macros were introduced long time ago in hope to implement
page cache with larger chunks than one page in future.

In fact it was never done.

Some code paths assume PAGE_CACHE_SIZE <= PAGE_SIZE. E.g. we use
zero_user_segments() to clear stale parts of page on cache filling, but
the function is implemented only for individual small page.

It's unlikely that global switch to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE > PAGE_SIZE will never
happen since it will affect to much code at once.

I think support of larger chunks in page cache can be in implemented in
some form of THP with per-fs enabling.

Is it time to get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* macros?
I can prepare patchset if it's okay.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)