linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: Warn user when powernow-k8 tries to fall back to acpi-cpufreq and it is unavailable.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:38:34 +0000
From:	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	"Gopalakrishnan, Aravind" <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com>,
	"rjw@...k.pl" <rjw@...k.pl>, Andre Przywara <andre@...rep.de>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andreas <linuxuser330250@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/cpufreq: Warn user when powernow-k8 tries to
 fall back to acpi-cpufreq and it is unavailable.

On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:36:56PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:

> Ok, how much can we rely on ACPI to have this ACPI_ADR_SPACE_SYSTEM_IO
> properly set on K8? Because the thing is, we want to use acpi-cpufreq on
> F10h onwards and leave powernow-k8 to K8s.

SYSTEM_IO only supports single processors and was superceded in ACPI 
2.0. Are there any single-core F10h?

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/